These are two applications, one for substitution of the deceased respondent no. 1 namely Ram Ji and another for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application. These applications are supported with an affidavit.
Notices were issued to the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.1.
List of old cases to be taken up at 2.00 p.m. has been revised. None appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose this application.
The reason shown in the affidavit for condoning the delay in filing the substitution application is sufficient. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The delay condonation application stands allowed.
It has been stated in the affidavit that respondent no.1 died on 4.5.1995. The application for substitution of deceased respondent no. 1, Ram Ji is allowed. Let the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 1 as mentioned in the prayer clause of the substitution application be substituted in the array of the parties. Necessary substitution be carried out by the office.
No order is passed as to costs.
Dated:11.1.2010 Vks/-
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 87014 of 2000 IN Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 87015 of 2000 IN Second Appeal No. 352 of 1978 Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
Allowed.
For orders, see order of date passed on the Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 87015 of 2000. Dated:11.1.2010 Vks/-
Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 3927 of 1978 IN Second Appeal No. 352 of 1978 Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
This is an application for substitution of deceased appellant no. 1 namely Kauleshwar Ram. It is supported with an affidavit.
Notices were issued to the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant no.1.
List of old cases to be taken up at 2.00 p.m. has been revised. None appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose this application.
It has been stated in the affidavit that appellant no. 1 died on 29.9.1978. The application has been made within time. The application for substitution of deceased appellant no. 1, Kauleshwar Ram is allowed. Let the heirs and legal representatives of deceased appellant no. 1 as mentioned in paragraph 2 of the affidavit supporting the substitution application be substituted in the array of the parties. Necessary substitution be carried out by the office.
No order is passed as to costs.
Dated:11.1.2010 Vks/-
Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 15866 of 1979 IN Second Appeal No. 352 of 1978 Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
This is an application for substitution of deceased appellant no. 1/1 namely Sheo Nath Prasad . It is supported with an affidavit.
Notices were issued to the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant no.1/1.
List of old cases to be taken up at 2.00 p.m. has been revised. None appears on behalf of the respondents to oppose this application.
It has been stated in the affidavit that appellant no. 1/1 died on 3.7.1979. The application has been made within time. The application for substitution of deceased appellant no. 1/1, Sheo Nath Prasad is allowed. Let the heirs and legal representatives of deceased appellant no. 1/1 as mentioned in paragraph 1 of the affidavit supporting the substitution application be substituted in the array of the parties. Necessary substitution be carried out by the office.
No order is passed as to costs.
Dated:11.1.2010 Vks/-
Civil Misc. Abatement Application No. 83602 of 2000 IN Second Appeal No. 352 of 1978 Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
List of old cases to be taken up at 2.00 p.m. has been revised. None appears on behalf of the respondents to press this application.
Since the substitution application of respondent no.1 has been allowed, this application for abatement stands rejected.
No order is passed as to costs.
Dated:11.1.2010 Vks/-