IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1434 OF 2018 (INJ) BETWEEN:
1. KATAIAH SON OF SEEGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.
2. MAHALLINGAIAH SON OF KATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
3. CHIKKANNA SON OF KATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT DINDIGADAHALLI HATTI, NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V MANJUNATHA., ADVOCATE (ABSNET)) AND:
D. C. MADHUMALATHI DAUGHTER OF LATE CHIKKANNA @ CHIKKAIAH, WIFE OF SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DINDIGADAHALLI HATTI, NITTUR HOBLI,GUBBI TALUK.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.09.2017 PASSED IN RA.NO. 46/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE GUBBI DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.04.2016 PASSED IN OS. NO. 195/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC GUBBI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 05.11.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE