IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.Nos.35916 & 36473 – 36475/2018 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT.KASTOORI W/O G KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO.748, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGLAURU-560095 ... PETITIONER [BY SRI H.S.DWARAKANATH, ADV.] AND:
1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SUBBAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS 2. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O. LATE. SUBBAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 3. SRI. B S SRINIVAS S/O. LATE. SUBBAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.925, BEGUR VILLAGE & POST, BENGLAURU 560068 4. SRI. T CHANDRANNA SETTY S/O. LATE. THAYAPPA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/AT NO.4/50 A, LINGAPURA MAIN ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BENGALURU-560084 5. SRI. C MUNI REDDY S/O. LATE. PILLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.5/13, 16TH CROSS, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, LAKKASANDRA EXTENSION, BENGLAURU-560030 6. SRI. G KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO. 748, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURLU-560095 7. SRI. SAMPANGI B K S/O. LATE. C KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT BEGUR VILLAGE & HOBLI, BENGLAURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGLAURU-560068 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI VISWANATHA SETTY V., ADV. FOR C/R-3; SRI B.C.SEETHARAMA RAO, ADV. FOR R-5; R-6 SERVED.] THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE CONSOLIDATED ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.1109/2007 ON I.A.NO.21 TO I.A.NO.23 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC, ORDER XVIII RULE 17 OF CPC AND ORDER XVI RULE 1 & 3 OF CPC RESPECTIVELY VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 06.08.2018 AND ORDER PASSED DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.24 FILED UNDER ORDER XIV RULE 5 OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-B DATED 06.08.2018.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R These writ petitions are filed against the order dated 06.08.2018 on I.A.Nos.21 to 24 in O.S.No.1109/2007 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District at Bengaluru ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.1109/2007 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petitions stand disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.