Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kasim Ali And 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondary ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Notices on behalf of opposite party Nos.1, 2, 3 & 4 have been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel.
Since the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has been directed to seek specific instructions in the matter, therefore, as to whether the notices to opposite party Nos.5 & 6 would be issued, shall be considered on the next date.
By means of this writ petition, the precise controversy is that as to whether while making appointment in the Institution in question other than the teaching staff the prior approval from the Competent Authority i.e. Inspector would be required or not. If such prior approval is required then what would be the stage of approval.
On the next date, learned counsel for the respective parties shall address the Court on the aforesaid legal point.
List this petition on 10.05.2019 as fresh.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Suresh/ [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kasim Ali And 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondary ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Rajesh Singh Chauhan