Heard the learned counsel for the respondent, who would contend that E.P.No.28 of 2007 in O.S.No.420 of 1995 is a limitation EP and that the EP amount comes to Rs.15,709/90 and that even after the filing of the EP, the decree holder has not realised even a single paisa towards EP amount. Before the Executing Court even though there was a plea taken by the Judgment Debtor that he has no means, Judgment Debtor has filed to prove the same. Hence, the Executing Court had ordered arrest.
A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN, J.
2.When the Revision was taken up for hearing on 26.03.2009, before this Court it was represented on behalf of the Revision Petitioner / Judgment Debtor that he will discharge the entire EP amount by 06.04.2009 ie., today. Now the learned counsel for the revision petitioner represents that on merits the Revision may be disposed of.
3.Atleast to show his bonafide the Judgment Debtor would have made part payment towards the EP amount. The learned counsel for the respondent would state that the Judgment Debtor is working as a President of the Co-operative Bank and he is getting monthly salary. Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the orders of the Executing Court in EP.No.28 of 2007 in O.S.No.420 of 1995 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Thirukoilur.
4.In fine, the Revision is dismissed. The Judgment Debtor is given time till 20.04.2009 to discharge the entire EP amount, failing which, the order of the Executing Court to arrest is to be executed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
ssv To, The Principal District Munsif, Thirukoilur