Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Karpaga Ramalingam vs State Represented By

Madras High Court|21 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing in the list on 09.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 16.11.2017. Even on that day also, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be posted today (i.e. 21.11.2017) under the caption ?for dismissal?. Today (i.e. 21.11.2017), when the matter was taken up for hearing, again there is no representation for the petitioner.
2.In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter and therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Alwarthirunagari Police Station, Tuticorin District.
2.The Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Karpaga Ramalingam vs State Represented By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 November, 2017