Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Karnataka Power Lifting Association And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|02 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.11859-11860 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA POWER LIFTING ASSOCIATION (R) (AFFILIATED TO INDIAN POWER LIFTING FEDERATION, JAMSHEDPUR AND RECOGNIZED BY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE), REPRESENTED BY ITS HON. SECRETARY SRI. SATHEESH KUMAR, AMBIKA NIVAS, K.C. ROAD, KUDROLI, MANGALORE – 575003.
2. MR. VINCENT PRAKASH CARLO, S/O NORBERT CARLO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A VENCE VILLA, D.NO. 3-80/15, BAJJODI MAROLI ROAD, MANGALORE – 575005.
... PETITIONERS (BY MR.M.SUBRAMANYA BHAT, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT & SPORTS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560001.
2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560001.
3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, YAVANIKA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001 4. EKALAVYA AWARD - 2015 SELECTION COMMITTEE, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, YAVANIKA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560001, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SRI SYED KEERMANI (BY MR.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R-1 TO 4) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R-4 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY 2ND PETITIONER FOR GRANT OF EKALAVYA AWARD FOR THE YEAR 2015 IN TERMS OF G.O. DATED 24.08.2015 AT ANNEX-B HAVING DUE REGARD TO THE SELF ASSESSMENT POINTS OF THE SECOND PETITIONER AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.M.Subramanay Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petitions have rendered infructuous by efflux of time. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Karnataka Power Lifting Association And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
02 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe