IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.18632 – 18636 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA CNC COMPANY PVT. LTD., REPT. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. VISWANATH KRISHNA DIKSHIT NO.D-103, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560044 ALSO AT NO.F-61 INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560044 2. VISHWANATH PRASANNA KUMAR DIXIT S/O LATE K Y DIKSHIT AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS NO.51, 3RD CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560072 3. ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES REPT BY ITS PARTNER MR VISHWANATH PRASANNA KUMAR DIKSHIT S/O LATE K Y DIXIT AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, NO.51, 3RD CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560072 4. VISHWANATH KRISHNA DIXIT S/O LATE K Y DIKSHIT AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS NO.51, 3RD CROSS NGEF LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560072 5. VIJAYALAKSHMI VISHWANATH W/O VISHWANATH KRISHNA DIXIT NO.51, 3RD CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560072 … PETITIONERS (BY SRI D R RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LTD., STATE OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, BRAHAMANANDA COURT NO.37, LALBAGH ROAD BENGALURU - 27 REGISTERED OFFICT AT MEGH TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, OLD NO.307, NEW NO.165 POONAMALLEE HIGH ROAD , MADURAVOYAL CHENNAI – 600095, TAMIL NADU 2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (REGIONAL OFFICE) IN NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560001 POST BOX NO.4528, BOMBAY CENTRAL POST OFFICE, OPP: BOMBAY CENTRAL RAILWAY STATION MUMBAI-400008.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER … RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION ANNEXURE-B DTD:21.2.2018 IN TERMS OF CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE R-2 - RBI DTD:01.01.2019 ANNEXURE-C AND THE OTHER CIRCULARS ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri D.R.Ravishankar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Taking into account the order that this Court proposes to pass, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with.
3. Heard and perused the records.
4. The petition are admitted.
5. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia are seeking a writ of Mandamus by directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 21.02.2018, submitted by the petitioners in terms of the circular dated 01.01.2019 issued by respondent No.2.
6. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitions be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners as per the circular dated 01.01.2019, issued by respondent No.2 and decide the same by a speaking order.
7. In view of the aforesaid submission and in the facts of the case, petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.02.2018, submitted in terms of the circular dated 01.01.2019, issued by respondent No.2 and decide the same by a speaking order, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order passed today.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
8. Accordingly, writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE nvj