Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Karan Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33759 of 2019 Applicant :- Karan Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Heard Sri Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The recovery of charas has been falsely planted on the applicant. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. The compliance of provisions of section 50 N.D.P.S. Act has not been made. There are four criminal antecedents against the applicant in which he has been granted bail either by this Court or by the court concerned as it has been explained in para 14, 16, 17,18 and 19 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant further undertakes that if the applicant is released on bail, he will not make misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in custody since 7.2.2019.
Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.
Upon hearing learned counsel and perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant -Karan Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime No.89 of 2016, under Section 8/22 N.D.P.S.(Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) Act, P.S. Kotwali Sadar, District Deoria, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 Rk
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Karan Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2019
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ix
Advocates
  • Ravindra Prakash Srivastava