Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Karan Dom @ Vinod Dom vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31019 of 2021 Applicant :- Karan Dom @ Vinod Dom Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 05 of 2021 under Sections 380, 411 I.P.C. registered at P.S.- G.R.P., Varanasi District- Varanasi.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of his own confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Alleged recovered mobile phone belongs to the applicant. There is no credible evidence against the applicant to connect him with the present case. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 14 of the Affidavit filed in support of Bail Application. Case is triable by Magistrate First Class. Further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.05.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of the accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence, case is triable by Magistrate First Class, without commenting upon merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Karan Dom @ Vinod Dom involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 A. Mandhani
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Karan Dom @ Vinod Dom vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Rajendra Singh