Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kapil vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6993 of 2018 Applicant :- Kapil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Himkanya Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate on behalf of complainant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged on 19.11.2017 by the informant against the applicant alleging that on 10.11.2017 he assaulted the daughter (15 years) of complainant Jaipal Singh with the intent to outrage her modesty.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that there is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. Entire prosecution story is false and fabricated. Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Prosecution case is not supported by any independent evidence. There is no allegation of sexual harassment against the applicant. Criminal history of the applicant has been properly explained. He is languishing in jail since 6.12.2017 (more than two and half months) and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that criminal history of the applicant has been explained Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Kapil involved in the Case Crime No. 134 of 2017, under Sections 354-B, 506 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Jahangirpur, District Bulandshahr be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kapil vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Himkanya Srivastava