1. When the application is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the applicant is not present.
2. In present application, the applicant has prayed for below mentioned relief:
"10(a) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to modify/clarify the order dated 2/12/2011 with clear direction to the Opponent to comply with the direction issued by this Hon'ble Court in order dated 29/3/2010 passed in Company Application No.295 of 2009 and be further please to direct the Opponent to at least consider the claim of the Applicant @ of Minimum Wages as fixed by the state government for textile industry as per the calculation submitted by the Applicant."
3. It is noticed from the application that the applicant has prayed for further direction to the opponent to comply with the direction issued by this Court in order dated 29/03/2010.
4. When the order dated 02/12/2011 in Company Application No.450 of 2011 was passed, learned advocate for the petitioner was not present.
5. At the relevant time, after taking into account the relief prayed for by the applicant in Company Application no.450 of 2011, the order dated 02/12/2011 was passed.
6. The observations, clarifications and directions contained in para-8(a) to 8(f) are clear and in view of the said order any further directions are not required.
7. Besides this, if the applicant feels any need or requirement for any other or further directions either independent of the order dated 29/03/2010 passed in Company Application No.295 of 2009 or based on the said order, then the applicant should adopt proper procedure as required by law. In present application any other or further directions cannot be passed.
8. Furthermore, as mentioned above, the observations, clarifications and directions contained in para-8(a) to 8(f) are sufficient and does not call for any further clarifications or directions. If according to the applicant opponents have not complied the directions contained in order dated 29/03/2010 then also the applicant should take out appropriate proceedings for non-compliance of the said directions.
9. With the aforesaid clarification, the application stands disposed of.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top