Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Kantha Bai vs The Principal ...

Madras High Court|13 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner seeks for the following relief:
To issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the impugned communication of the third respondent along with the extract of the communication dated 21.11.2014 and quash the entry in the SLR in so far as it is concerned to Survey No.255/2, Pudupakkam Village, Tiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and reverse the entry in SLR Register from Anaadeenam land of Pudupakkam Village, Tiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District in favour of the petitioners for the land situated in Survey No.255/2, measuring an extent of 9 acres and 29 cents by correlating the same to Paimash Nos.866, 867 and 868/1.
2.Heard both sides.
3.The impugned communication is nothing but an entry made in the SLR Register maintained by the respondents. According to the petitioner, an entry made in respect of Survey No.252/2, Pudupakkam Village, Tiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District in the SLR Register is not correct and therefore, it has to be rectified by reversing such entry. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the authorities concerned to look into the grievance of the petitioner, which, in fact, was made through a representation dated 05.01.2014. It is stated that the said representation is still pending. Accordingly, without expressing any view and the merits and the contentions raised by both parties, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the respondents 4 to 6 to consider the said representation of the petitioner and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also other parties interest in this matter, in K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
vri respect of the above said survey number. Such exercise shall be done by the respondents 4 to 6 within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.11.2017 Speaking/Non Speaking Index:Yes/No vri To
1.The Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
2.The Settlement Officer, Office of the Settlement Officer, Ezhilagam, Chennai.
3.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Kanchipuram District.
4.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District.
5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chingleput, Kancheepuram District.
6.The Tahsildar (Additional Headquarters), Tiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
W.P.No.16376 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kantha Bai vs The Principal ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 November, 2017