Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kaniyalal vs Chandrakant

High Court Of Gujarat|08 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Mahendra Chauhan, learned advocate for the appellant.
2. Admit.
The following substantial questions of law arise for determination:-
Whether the lower appellate court was justified in disregarding the clear unambiguous language used in the registered sale deed?
Whether the document Exh.27 can be said to have been duly proved and whether the courts below were justified in placing reliance upon the same?
Whether when part of the consideration had admittedly been paid, the sale deed could have been declared to be without consideration and void?
( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kaniyalal vs Chandrakant

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
08 February, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.