Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kangiyabhai vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|27 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Leave to amend.
This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.92/2011 with Dhanpur Police Station, Dahod for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 324, 504 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 25(1)(A)(B) of the Arms Act, and under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.
Learned Counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the chargesheet is filed. It is also submitted that though the names of the applicants are mentioned in the First Information Report, they have not played an active part in commission of the crime nor any weapons are used in commission of the crime. Considering the above aspect, it is submitted that the applicants may be enlarged on bail.
Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. C.M. Shah for the respondent-State.
Learned Counsels for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
In the facts of the case and only considering the specific role attributed to the applicants, this application is allowed and the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.92/2011 with Dhanpur Police Station, Dahod, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) EACH with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and subject to the conditions that they shall;
a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
b) not try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;
c) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
d) surrender their passports, if any, to the lower court within a week;
e) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
f) mark presence at the concerned Police Station on the first Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;
g) furnish the present address of their residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
The authorities will release the applicants only if not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.
At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.
Rule made absolute. Direct Service is permitted.
Before parting with the order, it is clarified that while deciding the bail application of the other accused/co-accused, the same shall be decided on merits and in accordance with law and this order granting bail to the applicants herein will not come in the way and will not be treated as a precedent.
Sd/-
(M.D.
Shah, J.) Caroline Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kangiyabhai vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2012