IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NOS.22110-22111 OF 2010(KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
KANAKAPURA KRISHI UTPANNA MARUKATTE VARTHAKARA SANGHA, (A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI M.V.GOVINDAIAH, APMC YARD, PETEKERE, KANAKAPURA TOWN, KANAKAPURA TALUK – 562 117 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI K.R.RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU.
2. THE UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA.
4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
5. REGIONAL COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DIVISION, BMTC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU.
6. PLANNING DIRECTOR D UP C OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
7. THE TAHSILDAR KANAKAPURA TALUK, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
8. CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPALITY TOWN MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KANAKAPURA TOWN, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT.
9. THE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, NO.16, 11TH RAJABHAVAN ROAD, P.B.NO.5309, BENGALURU – 560 001.
10. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR APMC YARD, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
11. THE SECRETARY APMC APMC YARD, PETEKERE, KANAKAPURA TOWN, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S.MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4, R6 & R7 SRI S.SUBHASH, ADVOCATE FOR R8 SRI T.SWAROOP & SRI H.K.THIMME GOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR R11 R5, R9 & R10 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) ***** THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R1 AND R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-K DATED 13.8.2009 & ALSO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R3 DATED 10.11.2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-L.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In view of the memo filed in the Court today by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE Rsk/-