Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kammoram vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8867 of 2019 Petitioner :- Kammoram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the application for injunction which accompanied the suit being Original Suit No. 478 of 2019 was not being decided. It has been stated at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the defendants had been served.
If that is the case, then the application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the C.P.C. in the Original Suit No. 478 of 2019 (Mammoram vs. State of U.P. and others) be decided within a period of two weeks from the next date fixed in the case.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 PK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kammoram vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2019
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Jagdish Prasad Mishra