Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kamarunisha vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35637 of 2021 Applicant :- Kamarunisha Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakant,Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam,Syed Irfan Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Ramakant Yadav and Sri Syed Irfan Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant is an old lady aged about 70 years of age and she is entitled to be released on bail under Section 437 (2) Cr.P.C. It is also submitted that there is no criminal history against her. The applicant is a lady and is in jail since 17.7.2021.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Kamarunisha, be released on bail in Case Crime No.55 of 2021, under Sections 420, 504, 506, 255 and 260 IPC, Police Station Cantt. District Varanasi on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. She will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. She will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021 SKM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kamarunisha vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Ramakant Mohd Kamar Shah Alam Syed Irfan Ali