Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Kamalam vs State Represented By The Sub Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|28 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR was filed in the year 2015 and the petitioner approached the respondent on various dates to expedite the investigation but till now no action has been taken. Stating so, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for a direction to the respondent police to file final report within a stipulated time frame.
R. MAHADEVAN.J., sr
2. Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondent.
3. Since the First Information Report has been filed in the year 2015 and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent is directed to complete the investigation and file final report in Cr.No.875 of 2015 pending on his file, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not filed earlier.
4. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.
28-06-2017 Index:yes/no website:yes/no To
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, E-1, Singanallur, Coimbatore-5,
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.12068/2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Kamalam vs State Represented By The Sub Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan