Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Kamal Trading vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 84 of 2019 Petitioner :- M/S Kamal Trading Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Learned Special Counsel contends that the goods have already been released in this matter. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this fact.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Kamal Trading vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Nishant Mishra