Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kamal Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 90 of 2019 Petitioner :- Kamal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Ji Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to implead the Gaon Sabha as one of the respondents.
Prayer aforesaid is granted. He may do so during the course of the day.
Sri Diwakar Singh has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no. 6 - Gaon Sabha.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Diwakar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 and perused the record.
With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
Present petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent no. 2 to dispossess the respondents no. 4 and 5 from the land of pond Gata no. 607 recorded in revenue record situated in Village Umarghana, Malwan, district Fatehpur within specific period as may be fixed by this Court.
In view of the aforesaid, it would serve no purpose to keep the writ petition pending, and therefore, it is directed that petitioner may submit a representation before the Assistant Collector bringing the relevant facts regarding encroachment over the aforesaid plot to the notice of the concerned Assistant Collector who, if no proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 have already been registered in relation to encroachment over the said plot, on receiving the aforesaid representation shall inquire into the allegations made by the petitioner after following the procedure prescribed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 read with Rule 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date when the aforesaid representation is filed by the petitioner. In case the allegations of the petitioner are found to be true the Assistant Collector shall ensure that the encroachments over the Gaon Sabha land are removed within a period of one month thereafter unless the order of Assistant Collector is stayed by any superior authority or court in any appeal or revision filed against the order of Assistant Collector.
It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the claim as raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.1.2019 p.s.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kamal Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 January, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Gopal Ji Rai