Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kamal Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 93 of 2019 Petitioner :- Kamal Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.
Learned standing counsel has submitted that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order dated 25.4.2018 and the writ petition is not maintainable.
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore and Ors. Vs. Mathew K.C.", MANU/SC/0054/2018, has held that if an effective alternative remedy is available, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable.
In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage.
The writ petition is thus dismissed as not maintainable. No costs.
Order Date :- 24.1.2019 rk
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kamal Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 January, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Awadhesh Kumar