Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 528 of 1989 Revisionist :- Kalu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- R.N. Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Notice was issued to revisionist to engage another counsel vide Court's order dated 02.04.2004. Perused the office report dated 30.07.2019. Service is deemed sufficient. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of revisionist. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by the judgments and orders dated 30.10.1986 and 30.03.1989. The Judicial Magistrate, Hapur vide order dated 30.10.1986 convicted revisionist and sentenced him to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1000/- under Section 7(1) read with Section 16(1)(A)(i) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Thereagainst, revisionist preferred Criminal Appeal No. 147 of 1986 and Appellate Court while dismissing appeal, confirmed order of conviction and sentence passed by Trial Court. Being aggrieved the revisionist preferred present revision.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. The accused, Kalu, is on bail. His bail bonds and surety bonds are cancelled. The Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned shall cause him to be arrested and lodged in jail to serve out the sentence passed against him. The compliance shall be prepared within two months.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 AK