Kalpeshkumar vs State

Today's cause list shows that notice qua respondent No.3 has remained unserved and notice qua respondent No.2 is not received back.

Mr.

Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioner, has, therefore, requested that fresh notice be issued and the petitioner may be permitted to serve the process directly.

In view of the said request by Mr. Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioner, office is directed to issue fresh Notice, making it returnable on 13.6.2012.

In addition to normal mode of service of notice, the petitioner is permitted to serve the process directly.

Direct service is permitted.

(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc Top