Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kallu ( Second Bail ) vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 January, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Praveen Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
This is the second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 8.5.2019.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the FIR is delayed by one day for which no plausible explanation has been given by the prosecution. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.4.2018. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Kallu, be released on bail in Case Crime No.0116 of 2018, under Sections- 307 IPC, Police Station- Jankipuram, District- Lucknow, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
The bail application is allowed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.1.2021 Dev Prakash.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kallu ( Second Bail ) vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh