Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that, after the grant of bail, the applicant due to some unavoidable circumstances could not appear before the court on the date fixed, consequently, non bailable warrant was issued against the applicant and his bail was cancelled.
Learned counsel further submits that the applicant undertakes that after release on bail he shall regularly attend the court on each and every date .
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant deserves to be bailed out.
Let the applicant Kallu Kurmi involved in Case Crime No. 321 of 1991, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 472, 170 & 420 I.P.C., P.S. Mahoba, District Mahoba be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
(iv)The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month to show his good conduct and behavior.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 19.1.2010 vinay