Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kallan vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27264 of 2018 Applicant :- Kallan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Qazi Vakil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State, and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against two accused persons namely, Kallan and Mauseen alleging that on 7.6.2018 they were arrested by the police with four countrymade pistols, one countrymade pistol 12 bore, three countrymade pistols 315 bore, cartridges, materials of manufacturing pistols.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Recovery is false and planted. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. There is no independent witness against the applicant. There is no legal evidence against the applicant. He is languishing in jail since 8.6.2018 (more than one and half months) criminal history has been properly explained and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that criminal history has been explained.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Kallan involved in Case Crime No. 162 of 2018, under Section 5/25 Arms Act, Police Station Rura, District Kanpur Dehat be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kallan vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Qazi Vakil Ahmad