Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kajal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6386 of 2019 Petitioner :- Kajal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupama Tripathi,Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life by adopting coercive measures.
The petitioners claim to be major, and have married with their free will. They are living together as husband and wife. The father of first petitioner is interfering in their peaceful married life.
Learned Standing Counsel states that in the present matter the father of the first petitioner has already registered an F.I.R. as Case Crime No.96 of 2019, under Sections 363/366 IPC at Police Station Farah, District Mathura.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 RKP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kajal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Anupama Tripathi Rakesh Kumar Tripathi