Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Kailash Rug Industries ... vs State Of U.P.And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 January, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the opposite party no. 2, Bachan Lal has himself submitted before the trial court that the name of the applicant has wrongly been mentioned in the complaint. Consequently no evidence will be adduced by respondnet no. 2 against the applicant.
Issue notice to respondnet no. 2 indicating therein that he may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this application after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2448/96 (State Versus Kailash Rug Industries) under Section 14 (1) of Prevention of Child Labour Act, 1986 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, Gyanpur shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 8.1.2010 HR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Kailash Rug Industries ... vs State Of U.P.And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 January, 2010