Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kahkasha Bano vs Shri Subhash L Y District Magistrate And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1209 of 2018 Applicant :- Kahkasha Bano Opposite Party :- Shri Subhash L.Y District Magistrate And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
By order dated 8.3.2018, the opposite party was required to appear before this Court and explain the circumstances in which the possession of the plot auctioned, has not been delivered to the applicant.
Sri Neeraj Tripathi, learned Additional Advocate General and Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party states that the possession of the auctioned plot has been duly delivered to the creditor Bank. Thus, full compliance has been made.
Counsel for the applicant does not dispute this fact.
In view thereof, nothing further survives in the instant matter. Notices issued to the opposite party are hereby discharged.
The application is consigned.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 29.3.2018 skv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kahkasha Bano vs Shri Subhash L Y District Magistrate And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Manoj Kumar Gupta
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar Tiwari