Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shri K Veerabhadraiah vs The State Government Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|24 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R.DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.54349 OF 2018 (S-RES) BETWEEN SHRI K VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.281, CHRISTIAN COLONY, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 AND (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER 1. THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, NO.105, I FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT OF KARNATAKA 3. DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560009 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR 4. OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A AND E) KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 56000, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL 5. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY OFFICE ZILLA PANCHAYATH MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 REP BY DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY OFFICER 6. THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER AND ENQUIRY OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560009 (BY SMT. M.S. PRATHIMA, AGA) ... RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONCLUDE THE ENQUIRY AT THE EARLIEST AND TO RELEASE THE SUPERANNUATION BENEFITS UNDER THE HEAD OF DCRG OF RS.488400/-[FOUR LAKHS EIGHTY EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED ONLY] AND CVP AMOUNT ALONG WITH 18% INTEREST TILL THE DATE OF DISPOSAL OF THIS W.P.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
The petitioner is a retired government servant, who was working as a Health Inspector at the time of superannuation. Since the petitioner is a retired government servant, he should have approached the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal for seeking the relief. Therefore, granting such liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, this petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE KLY/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shri K Veerabhadraiah vs The State Government Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
24 January, 2019
Judges
  • R Devdas