IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.3584 of 2016 BETWEEN:
1. K. Suresh Rangarajan S/o K.V. Vedantachari, Age: 42 years, Occ: Managing Director of Artha Group, R/at: No.110/37, Service Road, Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli, Bengaluru – 560 043.
2. R. Chandrashekar S/o late S.V. Ramani, Age: 43 years, Occ: Chief Operating Officer of Artha Group, R/at: No.110/37, Service Road, Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli, Bengaluru – 560 043. … Petitioners (By Sri. Chandra Chood, Advocate) AND:
1. The State of Karnataka By the Police of Sulibele Police Station, Bengaluru District.
Represented by The State Public Prosecutor, High Court of Karnataka, High Court Annex Building, Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. N. Venkatasubbaraju S/o late Venkataraju, Age: 48 years, Occ: Real Estate Business, R/at No.23, 7th Cross, Krishnappa Block, Bengaluru – 560 032. ...Respondents (By Sri. I.S. Pramod Chandra, SPP-II for R-1 Sri. S. Shankarappa, Advocate for R-2) This Criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the FIR in Crime No.47/2016 on the file of respondent No.1/Sulibele Police Station, Bengaluru District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 341, 506 r/w 34 of IPC (Now pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn) and JMFC, Hosakote, Bengaluru) in so as petitioners are concerned.
This Criminal petition coming on for Admission, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R The petitioners have challenged the FIR registered against them in Crime No.47/2016 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 341 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned SPP, who has taken notice for respondent No.1 submits that on completing the investigation, ‘B’ report has been submitted to the Court on 18.10.2016 and the matter is seized by the learned Magistrate.
3. In view of the said submission, reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the consequent order passed by the learned Magistrate, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE MBM