Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

K Shayamala Devi W/O vs The State Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|28 April, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN Between:
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRL.P. NO:4488 of 2014
1 K.Shayamala Devi W/o. Sheshadri,
2 K.Sheshadri S/o. Raghava Chary,
3 G.Venkateswar Rao S/o. Late G.Gopala Krishna Rao,
4 G.Yashoda W/o. G.Venkateswara Rao, . Petitioners/Accused AND The State of A.P., rept. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge of the petitioner on said in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 1261 of 2013 of PS., L.B.Nagar..
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor for the Responden,t the Court made the following.
ORDER:
“The petitioners seek for grant of anticipatory bail. They are accused 3 to 6. They allegedly committed the offences under Sections 420, 506 and 109 IPC.
The offences are triable by a Judicial Magistrate of First Class. It would be appropriate for the petitioners to surrender before the Trial Court and to move the Trial Court for grant of regular bail.
2. However, petitioners 1 and 4, who are accused 3 and 6, are ladies. The 2nd petitioner, who is accused No.4, is a senior citizen. In view of the sex of petitioners 1 and 4/accused 3 and 6 and in view of the age of the 2nd petitioner/accused No.4, I consider it appropriate enlarge these petitioners on anticipatory bail.
3. Hence, this petition is allowed so far as the petitioners 1, 2 and 4/accused 3, 4 and 6 are concerned. The petitioners 1, 2 and 4/accused 3, 4 and 6 shall surrender before the II Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad within 2 (two) weeks from today. On such surrender, the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad shall release them on bail on a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each in a like sum to his satisfaction.
4. So far as petitioner No.3/accused No.5 is concerned, this petition is disposed of granting liberty to him to surrender before the Trial Court and to move the Trial Court for grant of regular bail. In such an event, uninfluenced by any part of this order, the learned Trial Judge shall dispose of such an application on merits on the same day on which it is filed.”
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. The Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, L.B.nagar, Hyderabad.
2. The II Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad.
3. The Station House Officer, L.B. Nagar L & O Police Station, Cyberabad.
4. Two Ccs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
5. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, Advocate (OPUC)
6. One Spare copy HIGH COURT AB DRAFTED ON 29-4-2014 DR.KGSJ DATE: 28-4-2014 ORDER CRL.P. NO. 4488 OF 2014 DIRECTION
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Shayamala Devi W/O vs The State Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
28 April, 2014
Judges
  • K G Shankar