IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.56089 AND 56266-68 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN Ms. K.SHALINI PRASAD D/O SRI K V PRASAD AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO.128 RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE 560020 ... PETITIONER (By SMT.DEEPIKA MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.BADRI VISHAL, ADVOCATE) AND M/S FIRST FUTURISTIC HOLDINGS LTD A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.300/B (1/2 AND 1/3), 8TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE 560 080 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ... RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT THE XIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BANGALORE TO CONSIDER I.A.1 FILED IN A.A.NO. 25015/2014 SEEKING GRANT OF EX- PARTE INJUNCTION IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANN-K1, ALLOW I.A. NO.1 FILED IN AA NO. 25015/2014 PENDING BEFORE XIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BANGALORE VIDE AN-K IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO GRANT OF EX- PARTE ORDER.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Smt.Deepika Mahesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Records perused.
2. In these writ petitions, petitioner, inter alia, has assailed the validity of the order dated 29.11.2014, by which the trial Court has refused to grant exparte interim order on an application preferred by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for short).
3. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that subsequently an award has been passed by the Arbitrator, which is the subject matter of challenge in proceedings under Section 34 of the Act.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing further survives for adjudication in these writ petitions.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
sd/- JUDGE ln.