Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

K S Pruthvi Kumar vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|24 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.18794/2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN K.S.PRUTHVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O K.N.SHIVA KUMAR, SHOP NO.3, NO.12/A, ADITHYA EXTENSION, BEHIND CHRIST THE KING SCHOOL, RAGHAVENDRA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU.
(BY SRI.H.C.SHIVARAMU, ADV.) AND:
... PETITIONER 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER FOR HOME.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AVALAHALLI POLICE STATION, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 049.
3. M/S. INDIA READYMIX CONCRETE, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.58, CHEEMASANDRA VILLAGE, OLD MADRAS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 049. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR.V.D.RAGHAVENDRA.
4. B.T.NAGARAJ REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O B.N.THIMMA REDDY, NO.207/2, RANJITHA FARM, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU – 560 099.
5. M/S. SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE NO.14, 2ND FLOOR, LANGFORD AVENUE BUILDING, LANGFORD GARDENS, OPP. HDFC BANK, LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 025.
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION TO R-1 AND 2, PROHIBITING THEM FROM PROVIDING ANY PROTECTION TO R-5 AND ITS AGENT OR ANY PERSONS AUTHORISED OR ACTING ON THEIR BEHALF IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE – A PREMISES AND SCHEDULE – B MOVABLES ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri H.C.Shivaramu, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Learned Additional Government Advocate has produced the order dated 27.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Calcutta.
2. In view of the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the High Court of Calcutta in Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid.
Sd/- JUDGE nvj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K S Pruthvi Kumar vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
24 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe