Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Ramathilagam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Madras High Court|25 July, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.07.2017 ub To
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to the Government, Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.
2. The Directir of Thanjavur, Saraswathi Mahal Library cum Collector, Thanjavir.
3. P.Perumal, Conservator, Thanjavur Maharaja, Serfoji Saraswathi Mahal, Library, Thanjavur - 9.
4. M.Balasubramanian Preserver Cum Micro/Film Photographer, Thanjavur Maharaja Serfoji, Mahal Library, Thanjavur - 9 M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.
ub
W.P.No.16032 of 2004
25.07.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Ramathilagam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran