Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Ramalingam vs The District Collector Cuddalore District And Others

Madras High Court|28 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:28.06.2017 CORAM The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.16186 of 2017 K.Ramalingam ...Petitioner v.
1. The District Collector Cuddalore District
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Viruthachalam Cuddalore District
3. Tahsildar Viruthachalam Cuddalore District
4. The Executive Officer Mathakalir Manikkam Panchayat Cuddalore District
5. Selvam ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent herein to pass orders upon the enquiry conducted by him upon the complaint dated 24.03.2017 lodged by the petitioner within a time limit as fixed by this court.
For Petitioner : Mr. S.Annamalai For Respondent : Mr. A.N.Thambidurai, Spl. Govt. Pleader - for R1 to R3 Mr.J.H.Iniyan Govt.Advocate - for R4 O R D E R The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders upon the enquiry conducted by him upon the complaint dated 24.03.2017 lodged by the petitioner, within a time frame.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the 3rd respondent had conducted enquiry and the parties had also appeared before him, the 3rd respondent has not passed any orders so far.
3. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.J.H.Iniyan, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the 4th respondent.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to pass orders in accordance with law, based on the enquiry conducted by him, after issuing notice to the 5th respondent, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
No Costs.
28.06.2017 Rj To
1. The District Collector Cuddalore District
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Viruthachalam Cuddalore District
3. Tahsildar Viruthachalam Cuddalore District
4. The Executive Officer Mathakalir Manikkam Panchayat Cuddalore District M.DURAISWAMY, J., Rj W.P.No.16186 of 2017 28.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Ramalingam vs The District Collector Cuddalore District And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy