Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Ramalaingam vs Commissioner For Agriculture/ Registrar Of Agro Engineering Services And Others

Madras High Court|04 April, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that pending Writ Petition, the 1st respondent has passed final order, hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P.No.28759 of 2016 is closed.
04.04.2017
msr/msv Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking order To
1. Commissioner for Agriculture/ Registrar of Agro Engineering Services, Office of the Commissioner for Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2. The Deputy Registrar, (Agro Engineering Services), Office of the Commissioner for Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J msr/msv W.P.No.33286 of 2016 & W.M.P. No.28759 of 2016 04.04.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Ramalaingam vs Commissioner For Agriculture/ Registrar Of Agro Engineering Services And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 April, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar