IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.42831/2017 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. K.R.RENUKA W/O JAGADEESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS TOWN MUNICIPAL MEMBER KUSHALANAGARA TOWN PANCHAYATH KUSHALANAGARA – 571 234 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SUNIL S.RAO FOR SRI T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATES) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KODAGU DISTRICT MADIKERI – 571 234 3. THE TAHSILDAR SOMARPETE TALUK MADIKERI – 571 234 4. THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPALITY KUSHALANAGARA – 571 234 5. SRI M.E.MOHIDDIN VICE PRESIDENT KARNATAKA STATE SCIENCE PARISHAT KODAGU DISTRICT UNIT KODAGU – 571 234 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIVEK HOLLA, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI B.S.BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE/ORDER DATED 16.08.2017 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION COURT BANGALORE IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.5 submits that the allegation made by respondent No.5 against the petitioner is not correct, and therefore, respondent No.5 wants to withdraw the complaint made against the petitioner. He further submits that an appropriate application will be filed by respondent No.5 in this behalf, before the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court, Bangalore in the proceeding in L.G.C.(P) No.637/2017. His submission is placed on record.
2. In view of the above submission, Sri Sunil S.Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, when the occasion arises. Leave and liberty sought for is granted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE KSR