IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WP NO.42816/2018 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
MR. K. NARASIMHA S/O LATE K. KRISHNAMA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.591, 4TH CROSS BSK 1ST STAGE, 2ND BLOCK BENGALURU-50.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJAGOPALA NAIDU, ADVOCATE) AND THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E1) W-7, SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI H.V. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION AS PER ANNEXURE-H BY SANCTIONING THE POWER CONNECTION TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER, ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, in view of the proceedings initiated by the petitioner subsequent to filing of the present writ petition before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF), which is pending consideration, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the competent forum.
Sbs* Sd/- JUDGE