IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.17153/2017(KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
MR.K.N.SANTOSH KUMAR AGED 46 YEARS S/O LATE K.NAGARAJ RESIDING AT NO.62, BANASHANKARI KRUPA 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS, ARKERE MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 076 …PETITIONER (BY SRI SUNIL KUMAR.H, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND :
1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-1, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU – 560009 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU – 560 009 3. TAHSILDAR K.R.PURAM HOBBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU – 560 036 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU NORTH -560 009 5. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DIVISION VISWESWARAIAH TOWER DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 6. JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BENGALURU SUB-DIVISION K.R.CIRCLE BENGALURU – 560 001 7. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, (LAND ALLOTMENT) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001 8. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 9. M/S.GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR C/O KIADB INDUTRIAL AREA OFFICE INFOTECH PARK, WHITEFIELD BENGALURU -560 066 10. M/S.SUNRISE INTERACTIVE (I) LIMITED NO.6, C.V.RAMAN ROAD, RMV EXTENSION BENGALURU- 560 094 11. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO CONCLUDE THE PROCEEDINGS IN CASE NO.RRT/CR/01/12-13 FILED UNDER SEC -136(3)-KLR AT ANNEXURE-M AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In this proceedings office objections were not complied. Hence, an order was passed on 6.10.2017 directing the petitioner to pay cost of Rs.500/- to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund for non compliance of office objections on earlier occasion. In this regard, the order sheet would indicate that neither the office objections are removed nor cost is paid inspite of time being granted on 6.10.2017. Further, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner this day though this matter is called twice, once in the morning and again in the afternoon at 4.20 p.m. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
nd/-
Sd/- JUDGE