Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Menaka vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
05.09.2017 msvm To
1. Secretary to Govt., (AA2) Health & Family Welfare, Department, Fort St. George., Chennai – 600 009.
2. Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai – 600 006.
3. Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
msvm W.P.No.31506 of 2004 05.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Menaka vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani