IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.27997/2014 (GM RES) BETWEEN MR. K M VISHWANATH AGED 47 YEARS, S/O LATE MR. K.M. RUDRAYYA NO.64/3, 16TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, 5TH WARD, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560003. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SUHAS R.SHENOY, ADV. FOR ALMT LEGAL ASSTS.) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, II FLOOR, ‘E’ WING, KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE 560034.
2. RHOMBUS HOSPITALITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED NO. 202, 2ND FLOOR, SADAT COURT, 5 AND 6 MAGRATH ROAD, BANGALORE 560025 REPRESENTED BY IT’S DIRECTOR MR. AMITABH SHRIVASTAVA.
3. MR. AMITABH SHRIVASTAVA D 1206, MANTRI ELEGANCE N.S PALYA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE 560076.
4. SANJAY VAZANDAR RESIDING AT B/305, SHANKAR ENCLAVE, ASHOKNAGAR, KANDIVALI EAST, MUMBAI 400101 5. AMBAR MITRA NO.1102, SHOBA MAYFLOWER APARTMENT, 96/1 BELLANDUR, POST OFFICE OFF OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE 560103 6. MOHAN KADEMANI HOUSE NO.19/2, KADEMANI COMPOUND MALAMADDI, DHARWAD KARNATAKA 580007.
7. VISHAL VAZANDAR PLOT NO.109, GATEWAY PARK NALLURAHALLI ROAD, SIDDAPURA, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE 560066. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANUPAMA HEGDE, ADV. FOR R1, SRI SHREYAS.A, ADV. FOR SMT. V.GANGABAI, ADV. FOR R3, V/O DT: 3/4/17 NOTICE TO R-2 & 4 ARE HELD SUFFICIENT, R-5,6 & 7 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 4.3.2014 VIDE ANN-G ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR “PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP”, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Suhas R.Shenoy, Adv.for ALMT Legal Assts.
Smt. Anupama Hegde, Adv. for R1, Sri Shreyas.A.,Adv.for Smt. V.Gangabai, Adv. for R3.
This petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 4.3.2014 issued by the Registrar of Companies, Bengaluru-1st respondent herein.
3. When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has tendered his resignation from the services of the Company.
Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him under law with regard to the grievance, if the same still subsists.
With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Sk/- CT-HR