Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Karuppanan vs The Additional Commissioner

Madras High Court|20 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
20.11.2017 Index : yes/No Internet : Yes gmd/gsk To The Additional Commissioner, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
W.P.No.22648 of 2008
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Karuppanan vs The Additional Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban