Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K Kalaiselvi And Others vs The Authorised Officer And Others

Madras High Court|31 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.
vs No representation on behalf of the petitioners as well as the 2nd respondent. Even in the last three hearings, namely on 16.12.2016, 06.01.2017 and on 12.01.2017 there were no representation on behalf of the petitioners as well as the respondents. Due to continuous absence on either side, the case was directed to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, when the case is listed under the caption "for dismissal", there are no representation on behalf of the petitioners as well as the 2nd respondent. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
vs Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To The Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai.
31.01.2017 CRP(PD)No.2516 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Kalaiselvi And Others vs The Authorised Officer And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
31 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.