Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Smt K J Sheshamma W/O K R Jaghanatha Setty vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Telangana|26 August, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.24361 of 2014 Dated : 26.08.2014 Between:
Smt K. J. Sheshamma W/o. K.R. Jaghanatha Setty, Aged 55 yrs, Occu : House wife, R/o. D.No.9-1-58/3D, Panduranga Nagar, Hindupur Town, Anantapuram District.
.. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration & Stamps) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents This Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.24361 of 2014
ORDER :
In this writ petition, the only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the document presented by her for registration in connection with immovable property.
2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue submit that the subject matter to the extent of No Objection Certificate is squarely covered by the decision of Division Bench in W.A.No.1653 of 2013. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the land in issue are not assigned.
3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Hindupur, Anantapuram District (4th respondent) to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner without insisting upon such NOC and in the event the document presented fulfils the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, he shall register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. However, if the 4th respondent is of the opinion that the document presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the parties in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date : 26.08.2014 Rds
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt K J Sheshamma W/O K R Jaghanatha Setty vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao