IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.731/2007 BETWEEN:
K.DEVENDRAPPA S/O K.BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ARABAGATTE VILLAGE HONNALI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT …APPELLANT [(BY SRI S.SIDDAPPA, ADV. (ABSENT)] AND:
CHIKKAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs 1(a). SMT.YALAKI BASAMMA W/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT ARABAGATTE VILLAGE (POST) HONNALI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 217 1(b). SRI YALAKI MANJAPPA S/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT ARABAGATTE VILLAGE (POST) HONNALI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 217 1(c). JANAMMA W/O KOLI SIDDAPPA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT BENAKANAHALLI (POST) HONNALI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 217 1(d). SMT.RATHNAMMA W/O AJJIKWARANA SIDDAPPA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT ARABAGATTE VILLAGE (POST) HONNALI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 217 1(e). SMT.SAKAMMA W/O LATE KOLI GAVI SIDDAPPA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT MADHANABHAVI (POST) HONNALI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 217 1(f). SMT.KENCHAMMA W/O GUDDAHALLI HANUMEGOWDA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT KAGENAHALLI VILLAGE (POST) SHIKARIPURA TQ, SHIMOGA DISTRICT 1(g). SMT.MEENAKASHAMMA W/O BELLIODI HANUMANTHAPPA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT BELAGERE VILLAGE (POST) CHANNAGIRI TQ, DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 213 1(h). SMT.PARVATHAMMA W/O AMBLIKARIYAPPANAKARIBASAPPA D/O LATE C.CHIKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT SHANKALAPURA BHAGANAKATTE (POST) SHIKARIPURA TQ, SHIMOGA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (R1(a) TO R1(f) AND R1(h) ARE SERVED;
V/O DATED 01.10.2012 R1(g) HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:14.07.2006 PASSED IN R.A.NO.21/04 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND PARTLY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 8.3.2004 PASSED IN O.S.NO.154/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, SR.DN., HARIHARA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellant. The peremptory order dated 18.11.2019 is not complied. Therefore, the appeal already stood dismissed. No further orders are required.
Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-