IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NOs.16147 OF 2016 & 37383 OF 2016 (BDA) BETWEEN:
SMT. K. BHARATHI W/O. R M RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO 1, ASHWINI NILAYA, BYRAPPA GARDEN RAMACHANDRAPURA, JALAHALLI POST BENGALURU - 560013.
PETITIONER (BY SRI SANGANAGOUDA G PATIL, ADV. - ABSENT) AND:
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560020 REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER RESPONDENT (BY SRI G S KANNUR, ADV. - ABSENT) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD.15.12.2015 VIDE ANNEX-E AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT FOR PASSING ORDER ON THE SAID REPRESENTATION, FORTHWITH ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The plea of the petitioner is for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 15.12.2015 vide Annexure ‘E’.
2. Even as on the date, since the representation has not been considered, it is appropriate to direct the respondent to do so. Consequently, the writ petitions are disposed off. The respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 15.12.2015 vide Annexure ‘E’ and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy this order.
nvj SD/-
JUDGE