Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

K Anbazhagan General Secretary vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.38075 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
K. ANBAZHAGAN GENERAL SECRETARY DMK PARTY "ANNA ARIVALAYAM"
367-369, ANNASALAI TEYNAMPET CHENNAI-600 018 (BY MR. A K SUBBAIAH, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.
… PETITIONER 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LAW DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU -560001.
3. STATE BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL DIRECTORATE OF VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION CHENNAI-600028.
4. THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN SPECIAL C.C.NO.208/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVI ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE (C.H.NO.36), BENGALURU.
5. MR.BHAVANI SINGH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN SPL C.C.NO.208/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVI ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE (C.H.NO.36), BENGALURU.
6. SELVI J JAYALALITHA D/O LATE R JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT “VEDA NILAYAM” NO.81, POES GARDEN CHENNAI.
7. MRS V K SHASHIKALA D/O LATE VIVEKANDANAM AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT “VEDA NILAYAM” NO.81, POES GARDEN CHENNAI.
8. V N SUDHAKARN S/O LATE VIVEKANDANAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO.4 ARUNAGIRI STREET WEST KAMAKODI NAGAR VALASARAVAKAM CHENNAI – 87.
9. J ELAVARASI W/O LATE JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.181/69, HABIBULLAH ROAD T NAGAR, CHENNAI.
… RESPONDENTS (BY MR. Y D HARSH, AGA FOR R1, 2 & 4;
V/O DTD 26/08/13 NOTICE TO R3 DISPENSED WITH; MR. VIVEK HOLLA, ADV. FOR R6 & R7; MR. A ASOKAN, ADV. FOR R8 & R9;
MR. E S INDIRESH, ADDL GOVT ADV; NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R1 DATED 2.2.13 APPOINTING THE R5 AS THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR VIDE ANNX-D AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. Hence, the same may be dismissed.
The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K Anbazhagan General Secretary vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe