IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1230/2013 BETWEEN:
SMT. JYOTHI N.
WIFE OF GOVINDARAJ DAUGHTER OF NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT No.4, LINGAPPA LANE R.T. ROAD BENGALURU-560 053. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. H.R. SANJEEVE GOWDA, ADV.) AND:
SRI. R. GOPAL RAJU SON OF LATE T RANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT No.55, SOURASTRAPET O.T.C. ROAD BENGALURU-560 053. ... RESPONDENT (SRI. R. VIJYA KUMAR, ADV.) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.07.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1471/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 25.11.2019 stating that during the pendency of the present appeal, the decreetal amount along with interest has been paid by the legal representative of the deceased appellant in Execution Petition filed by the respondent herein in Execution Petition No.1032/2013 and hence, this appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, in view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
The Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the appellant on proper identification.
Sd/- JUDGE ST